Showing posts with label minor relationships overlooked much ado about nothing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label minor relationships overlooked much ado about nothing. Show all posts

Monday, September 24, 2012

The Hatred of Two Brothers


In Much Ado About Nothing, Don Pedro and Don John represents the classic tale of sibling rivalry that has stretches all the way back since Cain and Abel in the Bible.  But, unlike Cain and Abel’s rivalry of presenting the better sacrifices, Don Pedro and Don John’s rivalry is one caused by the sins of their father. In fact the rivalry presented within Don Pedro and Don John is one based on the social concept of status and not actual hate towards his brother.
                Don Pedro, unlike Don John, is the legitimate heir to his father’s fortunes. During the Renaissance era, (as stated in The Bedford Companion to Shakespeare), illegitimate children could not inherit anything from their fathers. (McDonald 263) Although, illegitimate children could not and do not inherit their father’s fortunes, they are still taken care of and given money for their education, but they are still frowned upon in society and it is hard for them to advance further in status because of the circumstances of their birth. They are often excluded and shunned from, “polite society” because they are bastards and Don John is no exception to this rule.
                Don John’s jealousy is not the classic, “I am jealous of my brother, because he is favored” but exhibits the other classic, yet complex jealousy issue of, “I cannot advance any further and is shunned by the rest of the world, because I am a bastard; Unlike my brother who gets to have everything I want, and therefore I must hate him” issue. The quote,
“I am trusted with a muzzle and enfranchised with a clog;
 therefore I have decreed not to sing in my cage.
If I had my mouth, I would bite;
if I had my liberty, I would do my liking:
in the meantime let me be that I am and seek not to alter me.”
                                                                                (Shakespeare p. 1423)
exemplifies the hardships that Don John goes through as his status of being a bastard child. He, unlike Don Pedro, is restricted. Don John cannot speak freely because if he did, he would lose the favor of the courts and the favor of his brother, who has more power and authority over him. The extent of Don John’s restrictions on what he can and cannot do is personified through the use of the cage imagery of him not being able to “sing” in his cage. This demonstrates a physical aspect of restriction and in this case it is the inability of mobility in status. Furthermore the beginning of the quote which shows that he is being muzzled represents the image of not being able to speak because it is covering his mouth. We further see this hate for his brother, because of status, in the quote,
                “Come, come, let us thither: this may prove food to
my displeasure. That young start-up hath all the
glory of my overthrow: if I can cross him any way, I
bless myself every way. You are both sure, and will assist me?”
                                                                (Shakespeare p. 1424)
which presents the image of a king being overthrown (Don Pedro), and a new leader (Don John), one that is not supposed to be on the thrown as the new leader.
                The hatred expressed in Don John towards his own brother is one that is manufactured by society and has turned his heart into stone. If society had been more accepting Don John and Don Pedro could have been more brotherly towards each other. But then again, Don John could try to recreate Cain and Abel, in which only one of them would come out to be Cain, and the other a dead sheep herder. 

Monday, October 4, 2010

Are Minor Relationships Overlooked?

Are Minor Relationships Overlooked?

After reading the conclusion of Much Ado About Nothing, it seems to me that one of the most overlooked yet crucial points of the play is Benedick's trust of Hero. Although they interact very little, it is Benedick's perception of Hero as a flawlessly moral woman which allows his "merry war" with Beatrice to turn from an entertaining game into a more serious and genuine romance.

It is, in fact, Hero that brings Benedick and Beatrice together. In Act II scene iii, when Claudio, Leonato and Don Pedro hold their staged conversation to convince Benedick that Beatrice loves him, there is no sure way for them to get Benedick to believe them. Initially Benedick suspects that it must be a trick. Soon the three men resort to using Hero's name to lend them some credibility, and as they continue to claim that Hero is the source from which they have learned of Beatrice's affections, Benedick becomes convinced: "This can be no trick. The conference was sadly born. They have the truth of this from Hero." (2.3, 196-197) While Benedick is distrustful of his friends, he holds Hero's word to be absolute truth. Thus it can be said that Hero is the one who made it possible for him to realize his love for Beatrice.

So when in Act V scene i Benedick challenges Claudio to a duel for Hero's sake, it is not simply about Claudio's mistreatment of any woman. Benedick says to his best friend, "You are a villain. I jest not. I will make it good how you dare, with what you dare, and when you dare. Do me right, or I will protest your cowardice. You have killed a sweet lady, and her death shall fall heavy on you. Let me hear from you. (5.1, 143-147) Benedick is willing to fight his best friend, but it is not for the sake of Hero as a woman so much as what Hero represents to him. It is, after all, the use of Hero's name in the well-intended trickery from Act II which led Benedick to let go of his pride and accept his feelings for Beatrice. I think Benedick is grateful to Hero, who he believes revealed the truth of Beatrice's feelings toward him. If Hero is not as morally upright and faithful as Benedick thinks, then it is possible that she lied about Beatrice's affections; and Benedick, wanting to cling to the hope that Beatrice loves him, can't accept that there is some doubt.

Benedick's complete trust of Hero's word is very important to the Benedick/Beatrice romantic plot, and without it the plan of Claudio, Leonato and Don Pedro probably would have failed. It is interesting to me that so few people have pointed this out, but I think in all the other action of the play things like this can be lost—much like Don Pedro's brief proposal to Beatrice, which is a very minor part that hints at a larger problem of Don Pedro being the only one who doesn't enjoy a romantic happy ending. This may not seem so important because Don Pedro's conflict with the villain Don John is wrapped up, but Benedick notes that Don Pedro seems sad in Act V scene iv and urges him to "get thee a wife, get thee a wife" (5.4, 117). For Don Pedro it is not an entirely happy ending, just a resolution to the greatest of his problems. This, too, seems to be lost amid the other plots and the joy of the other characters' happy endings.