Because most of
Shakespeare’s comedies use marriage as a symbol of a harmonious and healthy
social order and The Tempest does
not, I was intrigued by the ways in which he uses conflict to reach, one
assumes without finishing the play, a resolution. In Shakespeare’s comedies,
misunderstandings erupt, blocking situations are used and conquered, and at the
end, love triumphs and marriage sets everything right. The social order is restored. Although The Tempest is considered a romance rather than a comedy,
social order is an important aspect of the play, both in terms of the explicit
conflict of the play (Prospero’s fight to become Duke of Milan again) and in
terms of the play’s constant exploration of the master-servant dialectic,
especially when the dynamic appears unsettled or discordant. Prospero creates a
masque that will describe to the couple the importance of marriage versus love
and lust.
Just as Shakespeare seeks to resolve the conflict of his lost dukedom
through the marriage of his innocent daughter Miranda with the Duke of Naples’
son, Ferdinand, the masque uses social and dramatic associations of marriage,
and underscores them heavily with the seriousness of the masque. In doing this, a sense is created that, even
though the play’s major conflict is still unresolved, the world of the play is
beginning to heal itself. The fact of marriage itself, as it is presented in
the masque, is enough to settle the turbulent waters of the story.
The masque
begins with a pastoral description by Iris, Goddess of the rainbow and
messenger of Juno, starting the show with color and beauty. Iris declares to Ceres (Greek Demeter,
Goddess of agriculture, growth, prosperity and rebirth) that they are there for
“A contract of true love to celebrate” on the “blest lovers” (4.1.84,86). Once Ceres
ensures that Venus and Cupid are not involved (because they are the gods of lust,
not conjugated marriage) and Iris confirms “they to have done/Some wanton charm
upon this man and maid,/Whose vows are that no bed-right shall be paid/Till
Hymen’s torch be lighted,” we know that Prospero’s insistent theme in the
masque is to have them legally wed before any sex take place between them. Just as the queen of all gods blesses their
marriage, she also blesses the children that will come from their union. Instead, he explores marriage as part of society
and family. Juno, the symbol of marriage and family life in Roman mythology, descends
declaring, “To bless this twain that they may prosperous be/And honoured in
their issue” (4.1.104-105). In so doing,
marriage is subtly glorified as both the foundation of society and as part of
the natural order of things, given the accord between marriage and nature in
Ceres’ speech when she says,
CERES:
Earth’s increase, and foison plenty
Barns and garners never empty,
Vines with clust’ring bunches growing,
Plants with goodly burden bowing;…
Scarcity and want shall shun you,
Ceres’ blessing so is on you”
(4.1.110-113,116-117).
Thus, Prospero has managed to communicate to Ferdinand that his
virginal daughter will be his only after their legalized marriage ceremony
while blessing their union and, with that union, social order is restored.
1 comment:
Very few people have much to say about the marriage masque in this play, so I'm happy that TWO bloggers this week gave such good analyses of the scene!! I agree that the performance is important on various levels, but I appreciate your interest on the legal associations of the marriage ceremony and how this performance, in essence, is designed to ensure legitimacy. The language of "contract" points to that, too, and the play's social order hinges on the proper execution of various contracts, but especially the marriage of Ferdinand and Miranda.
Post a Comment