The title of the play ensures that
the character development of Hamlet in Shakespeare’s play would undoubtedly
take a prominent role. The first three
acts establish aspects to his temperament that most would consider good or at
least understandable. He is despondent
yet shrewd, loyal and brave. These
actions show Hamlet as working in revenge of his father’s untimely death thus giving
a heroic stance to his actions. However,
when Hamlet murders Polonius at the end of Act 3, it is disturbing. Before this seemingly senseless act it was
possible to consider Hamlet’s actions as laudable, as a son who will avenge his
father not rashly but with cunning and intelligence. The complexity to Hamlet’s character is
further revealed in Act 4, Scene 2. Hamlet
is shown not to be the prince hero but one who may actually be mad and not just
feigning madness. He is not remorseful for
Polonius’ murder, he acts self-righteously, and his manic behavior reveals that
his madness may not be faked.
A hero would be remorseful for a murder
even if it was justified, yet Hamlet does not repent following his murder of Polonius. This is obvious when, following the murder,
he tells his mother, “This man shall set me packing. I’ll lug the guts into the neighbor room”
(3.4.186-187). He does not describe Polonius, a man he knew well, even as a
person, but now is reduced to just “guts” that he will “lug” into the next
room. However, the coldness of his
response is more clearly illustrated when, at the beginning of Act 4, he flatly
states of Polonius’s dead body, that it is “Safely stowed” (4.2.1). At this point he is not even able to give
Polonius the respect of even naming his corpse.
He further reinforces his disrespect for Polonius’s body and its decent
burial when he tells Rosencrantz that he has “Compounded it with dust, whereto
‘tis kin” (4.2.5). Thus he has
disintegrated Polonius already from a living person to “dust.” Finally, when he ends the scene by not refusing
to tell Rosencrantz and Guildenstern where the body lies and instead playing a
game of “Hide fox,” he shows he could care less about a proper interment of
Polonius’s body which may not even exist in his mind any more (4.2.28). Hamlet’s lack of remorse for murdering his
girlfriend’s father reflects a cold temperament not in keeping with that of a
hero and barely reflecting that of a human being.
Despite such immoral behavior, Hamlet
presents himself as self-righteousness in this scene. All kings of the time relied on courtiers to
provide them with information, yet for those roles Hamlet condemns Rosencrantz
and Guildenstern. When he calls Rosencrantz
a “sponge,” he shows that he has no respect for him as friend or courtier (4.2.10-11). Furthermore, he puts blame not on himself for
the heinous murder of Polonius, but turns the tables on Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern by accusing them of pandering to the king. When
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern ask Hamlet where he disposed of Polonius’s corpse,
he is insulted that they would even ask him. This is evidenced by his reply
that “to be demanded of a sponge—what replication/should be made by the son of
a king?” (4.2.11-12). He asks why he, the king’s son, should listen to two
panderers who are beneath contempt to him. Furthermore, when he tells them the king
will use them “like an ape an apple in the/corner of his jaw, first mouthed to
be last swallowed,” it illustrates his utter contempt of them and the king they
pander to by comparing the king to a lower form of animal and to both of them
as even lower, as a piece of food kept waiting in the mouth until ingested (4.2.16-17). Finally, he refers to Rosencrantz twice as a
“sponge,” describing him not as the sponge who can easily grasp a situation
intelligently but as an inanimate object that can be indiscriminately
“squeezed” whenever the King wants.
Hamlet’s true manic-depressive
behavior is now revealed to be not feigned.
He committed murder with a reliable witness, his mother, and would be
expected to be fearful. Nevertheless, he
is seemingly calm as represented by stating those two words, “Safely
stowed.” Before this instance with
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet treated them as friends, although a little
crazily. Not being privy to Hamlet’s
secret pact to act crazy, they do not understand when he tells them that if he
takes Polonius’s body to the chapel, he will no longer be thought mad. This is evidenced when he says, “That I can
you’re your counsel and not mine own” (4.2.10).
In addition, Hamlet’s mania and lack of trust for his friends through his
repetitive speech: “The body is with the King, but the King is not with the
body. The King is a thing--”
(4.2.25-26). Finally, by running away
from Rosencrantz and Guildenstern instead of seriously considering how to
dispose of Polonius’s body, Hamlet exhibits childish and manic behavior. This is emphasized by Shakespeare since this
is the first direction of Hamlet’s action exhibited yet in the play. In Act 4, Scene 2, Hamlet displays glimpses
of his still-evolving complex character traits that hint at disastrous
consequences of actions still to come.
1 comment:
Barbara, I found your post intriguing to read. I certainly agree with your perspective in assessing Hamlet’s un-heroic behavior. To add to the examples you mentioned, and in keeping with another prevalent theme in this week’s blog posts—the mistreatment of women in Hamlet—I find Hamlet’s treatment of Ophelia to be particularly despicable. It’s hard to imagine that someone, even as distraught as Hamlet is over his father’s death, could find it in his conscience to speak so sexually demeaning toward Ophelia. Hamlet’s immoral behavior really makes me question just how “heroic” he is. In fact, the way Hamlet is so calculated makes me question the authenticity of his feelings. I certainly do not blame him for avenging the heartless, unnecessary murder of his father, but he could have gone about it in a much more effective way, certainly without hurting Ophelia or killing Polonius.
Post a Comment