The
first aspect of the play I noticed as I read the first act is the negative
reception received from King Lear at being confronted with honesty. The first instance in which this is
demonstrated is when King Lear is partitioning his land to his three
daughters. He has each daughter express
the immensity of her love for him, and makes a game out that can rightly be
called “Who loves me most?” When his two
older daughters, Goneril and Regan, flatter their father with such profound
pronouncements of love, which we can tell are superficial in nature, he
receives them well and marks their land inheritances on the map. When Coredelia’s turn arrives the king
expects her to try to surpass her elder sisters in her love for him as her
father, but instead she states “I love your majesty / According to my bond
[filial duty]; nor more nor less” (1.1.91-92).
He insists that she speak more lovingly to him, but she refuses to
sweet-talk him and remains honest and sincere:
Good my lord,
You have begot me,
bred me, loved me; I
Return those
duties back as they are right fit,
Obey you, love
you, and most honor you. (1.1.94-97)
She
explains to her father that it seems questionable for her sisters to have
husbands if they love him above all else, which hints at their
insincerity. Cordelia tells him that
when she marries, half of her love will go to her husband, as it should, while
the other half shall stay with him. Her
honesty is not received well, as he denies her any inheritance and disowns her
as his daughter. King Lear demonstrates
here that flattery is what appeals to him.
This relates to his insistence on keeping his one hundred knights. By having them around him, King Lear remains
powerful and noble looking. Superficial
and shallow is the king, who cares very much about appearance and frivolous
things. He wants the title of king and
the splendor that comes from being king, but he does not want to be burdened
with the stress and woes of the position.
This truly reveals how phony he is, and how skewed his priorities are.
We see another instance in which
honesty and truthfulness are not acknowledged in a positive light when Kent
stands up for the disowned Cordelia.
Kent, having served King Lear many years, truly honors him, but feels that
he has stepped out of line in his reaction to Cordelia’s response (excuse the improper structureof inset quotation - certain lines did not fit well and needed to be moved down to maintain the clean "block-like" appearance, else they would be jutting out):
Think’st thou that
duty shall have dread to speak,
When power to
flattery bows? To plainness [plain
speaking]
honor’s bound,
When majesty
stoops to folly. Reverse thy
doom [revoke
your sentence],
And, in thy best
consideration, check [halt]
This hideous
rashness. (1.1.147-151)
Kent
insists that Cordelia loves does not love King any less than his other two
daughters, and that her words contain no insincerity within them. Lear becomes infuriated with Kent’s
questioning of his decision to disown Cordelia and his defending of her
behavior. The disgruntled king lays his
hand on his sword, ready to attack Kent!
This seems pretty drastic to me, especially considering how much Kent
has done for him. He banishes Kent and
threatens to have him killed if he sets foot within kingdom. King Lear’s admonishment of Cordelia’s and
Kent’s honesty is ridiculous. It is as
if King Lear is saying “Tell me lies” because those sweet words of falsehood
provide him with a sense of security.
1 comment:
Good points and I think it wasn't so far fetched of an idea for King Lear to banish Kent because, after all, wasn't he looking for "lies" and Kent was an obstruction to his fantasies. King Lear's childish moves not only led him to believe that his daughters were being truthful to him in their claim to love him, but also instilled a sort of "dreamworld" in him where he couldn't distinguish between what was reality and what he desired. I can't help but feel sorry for King Lear for the only reason I could think of for his immature decisions is the lack of love he must have had in his life. There could be no other reason to be so pitiful in trying to gain love by throwing wealth at his daughters.
Post a Comment