Thursday, April 12, 2012

Far From a Fairytale


We know that King Lear is a tragedy but we are not really sure why until we begin to read it. At first I thought that it was a nice story. It had a fairytale kind of start with three beautiful daughters and a map that showed their land. The setting was a castle and I could close my eyes and picture the beautiful and elaborate clothing.
Right away we learn that King Lear is giving up power and control of his kingdom before he is too sick. However, he wants to be called King until his death and he wants 100 of his knights always with him. I figured that this theme was what made the play a tragedy. I could imagine how the next few lines would go. Like King Richard and King Henry, we have a King that has disturbed some order and will surly shed blood before the closing act. I was wrong.
I began to understand that he was an older man during a time in which a King did really keep the peace and order in a country. Lear was truly troubled when he had to give up his country and ultimately his power to daughters, women. This is where the tragedy lied. A King had to step down. King Lear was a person that had the power at all times and now he had to give it up. He had becoming older and was relying on his daughters because they were all he had left. Without his power and his control, Lear was just a weak and vulnerable man. I still don’t like his character, but could relate a tiny bit after reading and seeing the way his daughters treat him. Shakespeare made King Lear a human being.
The daughters were the object of my dislike in Shakespeare’s King Lear. Two out of the three were conniving and manipulative. During the ‘love test’ scene all their devious words needed no dissection. They said things to try and win over their father. Though there was still an incestuous tone between the King and his children, it was much more muted. I felt that Goneril and Regan were preying on their father. They were no longer powerless, but slowly becoming dangerously powerful. Regan and Goneril take power to another level and I feel ultimately will be the two that make this play into a tragic story.
Cordelia’s character was drastically different from her sisters. In my opinion she is the strongest character in King Lear that we have met so far in the first act. Her utterances during the ‘love test’ show a woman that has had enough. Cordellia says, “Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave my heart into my mouth. I love your majesty according to my bond; nor more nor less” (1.1.90). She is no longer performing for her father even if that means she does not get control of land. He simple statement is a breath of fresh air to the scene.

4 comments:

Steph Cryan said...

I fully agree with your last statement dealing with Cordelia. As of yet, she appears to be the strongest person in this play. She refuses to pamper her father for the sake of land, and instead says she can't express her love in words and she loves him just as much as she should. She goes for the proper ideal of how much one should love one's father in this time even if she does go against how a lady should express herself. I find her to be the strongest and most interesting character in King Lear as of yet.

Timothy said...

I agree with a lot of what you said about Lear's decision to give his land and kingdom to his daughters, and also what you said about his daughters. An aspect of your post that I found especially interesting was how by doing all of this Lear disturbed the order of things. As with most of the tragedy's involving monarchs it involves the upsetting of the order of things and they can only be set right when things are put right.

Cyrus Mulready said...

The connection to fairy tales is really observant, Kate. There is definitely a quality to the story of the fairy tale, and Shakespeare probably knew the tale, at least in part, from that tradition. This makes it all the more interesting that he transforms the story into a tragedy.

Megan Kalmes said...

I agree with your statement that Cordelia is a refreshing character compared to the others in the play. She seems to be one of the only characters who is not completely consumed with gaining land and money. The other characters, including her own sisters, are so obsessed with inheriting more that it results in a complete disregard for any other individual aside from themselves. In this respect, Cordelia is seen as a foil character when compared with her sisters. Cordelia’s rationality is only further emphasized when compared to her sisters’ lack of compassion and humanity.