Looking Back

While rereading my posts I have realized that my best post was my first one, and it can be seen that both of my following posts were written out of sheer panic. Taking 19 credits this semester is a bit tiring, so I must admit there have been times my mind has floundered and I almost forgot to post entirely. My first post appears to be the most thought out, most reflective of my readings. I also rather enjoyed The Merchant of Venice compared to the other two texts and this is reflected in the passion I had in defending Shylock as not a villain but a victim of circumstance.

I have also noted a similar suggestion to all of my posts, and that I am in a means defending the "villain"; I felt sympathy for Shylock because of his turbulent tormentors; I felt Angelo was a rather noble character in Measure for Measure; I showcased the vulnerability of Richard in Richard II. With this reoccurring theme it appears as though I am seeking the beauty and realism of Shakespeare's "bad guys", seeking that humanistic encounter of his characters. I find them all to be more realistic than their counterparts.

What I am taking from rereading my older posts is to broaden my understanding of ALL characters, not just the ones I favor, thus giving me a better interpretation of the plays as there whole. I also really need to begin my posts earlier, thus giving me more time to think them out and articulate my messages a little better.