From the opening of Measure of Measure, it is clear that the society which the characters inhabit is completely obsessed with sex. This obsession, much like our modern day American society, stems from authorities who attempt to stifle a humans natural urges. What results from giving something the aura of being taboo, is our unconscious tendency to gravitate towards the subject in question simply because, the forbidden is enticing.
In our modern day America, we are monitored and censored throughout every moment of every day. From strict school dress codes that rigidly punish all violators, to FDA on air regulations limiting free speech, to images we aren’t supposed to be viewing, it seems that authorities in American society love to restrict our contact with all things raunchy. The problem with such restriction is that, the more you try to enforce rules that the people don’t agree with, the more they will fight against them.
The same can be said of the society Shakespeare has created in Measure for Measure. From the opening, it is clear that the Duke of Vienna is struggling with the responsibilities of ruling. Though the audience is not immediately informed why, the Duke takes a leave of absence and surrenders control of Vienna to Angelo. Angelo’s ruling style is a sudden dramatic shift for all the people of Vienna. His method seems to involve strict rules and even stricter punishment. Though his intentions are good, all he seems to succeed in doing is aggravating the people of Vienna, and ruining Claudio’s life.
In the second scene, the reader is further convinced of Vienna’s obsession with sex from the conversation that takes place between Lucio and two gentleman who are with him. They banter on about venereal diseases and how much money they have spent on prostitutes as Mistress Overdone joins their conversation. Mistress Overdone is the head of the brothel, and it can be concluded from her conversation with these men that she is well acquainted with them and their frequenting of her brothel. With the entrance of the Mistress, a new plot point is introduced to the audience. Apparently the character Claudio was arrested for impregnating his lover Juliet. This is yet another plot point driven by sex. To further the audiences certainty that sex is a prominent topic in this play, we are then informed that Angelo, in an effort to control the city, is closing down all the brothels in the suburbs. We also learn that although he may have tried to shut down the brothels in the city of Vienna, a wealthy investor prevented it.
Act one then concludes with the introduction of a character who lies at the other end of the sexually driven spectrum. Isabella is Claudio’s sister, and she is currently trying to become a nun. Such restrictive behavior is only another form of obsession. The conscious decision to join a nunnery and end all contact with men is Isabella’s way of contending with her society. The audience can assume that her philosophy about Vienna may closely parallel Angelo’s who also practices restricting behaviors that he deems unacceptable. Isabella is asked to plead with Angelo for her brothers sake, and so the plot of Measure for Measure is well underway.
4 comments:
You make such a great argument as to why crimes are committed. I also believe that many crimes that are committed are done so because of the thrill of breaking a rule. While I do not think this is true in every case, I think it is an interesting issue nonetheless. It is such an interesting issue because it goes back to something else that you have mentioned. That is the fact that people fight against things they do not agree with. This seems to be what is going to happen in Claudio's case. He obviously does not agree that a death sentence is a fair punishment for his crime of passion...I happen to agree. So, in an effort to fight the system he has called on his sister to fight for his freedom. I have a feeling that this "measure for measure" dynamic is something we are going to see a lot. After all, why name this playMeasure for Measure if we weren't?
This is a great post. I especially loved when you wrote, "The problem with such restriction is that, the more you try to enforce rules that the people don’t agree with, the more they will fight against them." So true. I can definitely feel the tension throughout the first act and know that chaos will unfold throughout the rest of the play. I also loved the fact that you brought up Isabella and how she really is on the opposite side of the sexual spectrum than the majority of the other characters, but at the same time, her character is still extremely focused on sexual boundaries and control. I feel like some sort of twist could arise from this as well, maybe even creating a critique on the nunnery in general and the idea of disregarding sex or speaking to men.
This is a very interesting post, Stephanie, and I really appreciate how you compare the world of the play to our modern world. The puritan beliefs for which Angelo stands, I would argue, have a heavy influence on our society--the feelings of shame and "dirtiness" that we associate with expressions of sexuality, the need to control sexual expression, etc. Will the puritans win out in the world of the play? I'll be curious to see what you think!
I do find you logic warped.
We are prohibited from killing, stealing, fraud, trespassing, etc.
Does that justify violating those laws?
The answer is no.
That applies to other aspects of life.
Society today has lost its family values and morality.
Post a Comment