Monday, February 7, 2011

Dysfunction

While reading it is impossible to notice the complete dysfunction of everyone involved, which can be broadened to the whole society. Just beginning with 2.2, the exchange between Lancelot and Gobbo illustrates the extent at which there is a certain madness to the play. Gobbo encounters Lancelot, his son, and asks for directions to Shylock. Without Gobbo knowing it is son allows Lancelot to fool him: “O Heavens, this is my true-begotten father who, being more than sand-blind-high-gravel-blind knows me not. I will try confusions with him” (lines 28-30). Although his joke with him is in good humor, it is neither the time nor place for jokes. Gobbo is clearly a somewhat confused man, and to top it off, Lancelot tells Gobbo that his son is dead. The humor in this joke relies on his blindness, but this is also what makes it such a cruel gesture.
Adding to the dysfunction of the play is Jessica, Shylock’s daughter, leaving the house to live with Lorenzo. The whole operation of leaving becomes a huge ordeal because Jessica is Jewish and Lorenzo is a Christian. It becomes a mess because Lancelot is the messenger for Jessica, who tells Lorenzo how the plan will be executed, who then gets his friends, Graziano, Salerio, and Solanio to aid in the plan to help Jessica escape, which includes her dressing up in men’s clothing. Further, adding to the confusion is Lancelot recently resigning from employment with Shylock, who he then goes to work for Bassanio. The humor is that Lancelot is working for Bassanio, who is in debt to Shylock through his good friend Antonio. The utter confusion that this story creates is amazing. Everyone is intertwined with each other through some channel, and they are often difficult and confusing matters. The best part is how true this play stays even today. The issues of race, religion, money, and love are the driving forces behind everything we do, and Shakespeare was able to combine them in such a twisted way to create this comedy.

4 comments:

Andre Lancaster said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Andre Lancaster said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Andre Lancaster said...

Dysfunction is to Shakespeare as chaos is to classical drama.

Typical Shakespeare devices. Plot confusion. He said, she said. Mistaken identities. And the cross-dressing identities of Portia, Jessica, and Nerissa.It just makes your head spin right?

Shakespeare is purposely making it difficult for us (with the prefix of "dys" actually meaning difficult, bad). He's bringing us into chaos in order to arrive back into the classical tradition of order.

But I have to admit there were many times in MoV when I raised my fist in air in complete confusion, screaming, "Damn you, Shakespeare!"

Jenn Mathias said...

I also see the dysfunction in the play. Everyone is together when they are not necessary supposed to be, Bassanio is starting a relationship with Portia for all the wrong reasons when clearly, there are feelings for Antonio. It actually kind of aggravates me how dysfunctional it all is and how wrong. It's as if I don't want Shakespeare to tell us some of those facts because I have sympathy for Portia. How do we know that Lorenzo is not with Jessica to piss off Shylock? If characters like Bassanio possess the ability to be with someone for wrong reasons, why not Lorenzo as well?